Attending: Joao, Manqi, Ouyang, Zian, Chengdong, Zhaoru
Vidyo: Liantao, Mang Wang, Shufang
1. Joao’s talk:
2. Manqi’s update for Chapter 10
Now all the red mark in this chapter are all fixed.
3. Inclusion of statement on muon identification inside jets
Studies have been done the show muon identification inside jets is far from 100% using PFA-only information. This problem may be asked in the review.
Joao provided some support statement from other experiments and it has been seen by others, and it is documented in all previous CDRs and TDRs.
The aim is to show that we know the limitation of PFA so we need muon detector to improve the efficiency. We can make the combination of some information from Joao's slides and add statement that muon chamber can improve the efficiency to 95%. This statement can be shown in muon and performance chapters.
Manqi suggested that the efficiency and purity table is not shown in CDR because we don’t understand the result well. replace the table with statement, with reference added.
We will go both algorithm study and muon detector optimization together.
4. Magnet:
Zian said this chapter has all the right figures and dimensions for the Yoke now.
Joao said the reviewer may ask whether the Booster is too close to the magnet, Zian will check the distance and prepare to answer the question. The question is about the stray field for the magnet. This can justify the need for a larger Yoke.
Joao suggested to make a separate note to explain FTS and refer it in the CDR. Manqi will help Zian to prepare the note.
5. Joao said that we should decide which document No. will be used. Manqi suggested to keep IHEP-CEPC-DR-2018-01 for accelerator CDR and 02 for detector&physics. Rmove the IHEP-EP-2018-XX and IHEP-TH-2018-XX, since we didn't keep tracking these categoty.
6 Vertex
7. Full silicon
Joao asked that since the d0 resolution for full silicon vertex is as good as baseline, why the impact parameter is worse?
Weimin( not present at the meeting?) explained it is caused by less material. Chengdong said the vertex in full silion tracker is different with baseline. The two first layers in the baseline vertex detector are close together, in the same support, but in the FST the second layer is placed at a larger radius. This can explain the worse impact parameter resolution.
The amount of material for the support structure is just split in half for the first two layers, so the material is the same for the baseline and the FST. This is not realistic because one is not likely to build such thin support structure. So it is the same material for the support, the only difference is the position of layer 2.
Chengdong will help to read the text and try to find mistakes.