1. IE browser is NOT supported anymore. Please use Chrome, Firefox or Edge instead.
2. If you are a new user, please register to get an IHEP SSO account through https://login.ihep.ac.cn/registlight.jsp Any questions, please email us at helpdesk@ihep.ac.cn or call 88236855.
3. If you need to create a conference in the "Conferences, Workshops and Events" zone, please email us at helpdesk@ihep.ac.cn.
4. The max file size allowed for upload is 100 Mb.

CEPC Flavor Physics Discussion

Asia/Shanghai
Description

Overleaf link of CEPC Flavor White Paper for co-editing:
https://www.overleaf.com/6544624919ndzjrvxdcbzb

Relevant documents (e.g. minutes, slides, references...) can be found at:
https://docs.ihep.ac.cn/link/AAB56818007D3A46D8839ABDB81124C410

Zoom link:
Topic 主题: CEPC Flavor White Paper Discussion
Meeting ID 会议号: 83278870513
Begin Time 开始时间: 2022-12-08T 10:30:00
Duration 持续时长: 150 minutes
Meeting URL 会议链接:: https://ihep-ac-cn.zoom.us/j/83278870513?pwd=UDZGR0R5NG9uc1VaNVNhbDZMd1B0UT09
Password 会议密码: 819418
H323 接入IP: 221.122.88.195
Resource ID 资源号: video10@zoomrooms.cn
Timezone 时区: Asia/Shanghai

Minutes for CEPC Flavor White Paper Discussion

Date: 2022.12.08 10:30-12:00 (Beijing time)

Participants (12): Tao Liu, Lorenzo, Liming Zhang, Lingfeng Li, Anson, Yingying Li, Xuai Zhuang, Manqi Ruan, Hao Liang, Hanhua Cui, Yongfeng Zhu, Yuexin Wang

Indico page: https://indico.ihep.ac.cn/event/18498/

 

Talk by Hao: Measurement of Vcb from W→μνqq

  • Need further comparison with FCC (the fundamental difference?)
    • Signal efficiency & purity
    • Full simulation results
    • Assumption of flavor tagging
    • Luminosity, etc.
  • Anticipated precision of Vcb should at 1% level
  • Possibility to measure Vcb via full hadronic decay?
    • May provide additional information, but challenging (e.g. jet confusion)
    • Corresponding accuracy unlikely overwhelms the semileptonic one (which is much easier to handle)
  • Using information at event level instead of jet level analysis
    • We always lose some message at jet level analysis
    • Hao proposes to use neural network with particle level information as inputs
      • Using truth level particles as first step
  • Flavor tagging efficiency should be a function, instead of using the average efficiency
    • Dependence on the jet energy/PT/polar angle, etc.
  • Efficiency of W→cb different from that of W→c(s/d) or W→u(s/d)
    • Possible reason: the missing PT cut or the MC uncertainty?
    • The missing PT cut may cause systematics

Talk by Hanhua: Jet charge measurement at CEPC

  • To further understand the fragmentation method of different generators
    • The only difference of different generators is the hadronization and the parton shower
  • To quantify the possible correlation induced by hard gluon emission
    • Look into the dependence on some jet shape parameters (like thrust, Y23, etc.)
  • Also plan to look into the dependence of jet charge performance on the ECM
  • Muon has the biggest difference
    • Maybe hadron decay should be taken into account
    • b cascading
  • Benchmark applications
    • All CP violation related measurements
    • Some new physics may be also sensitive to the jet charge
  • Current two methods (Leading Particle & Weighted Charge)
    • Weighted Charge: the traditional one, dominate the b-performance
    • Leading Particle: only use one dimensional information
    • Suggest to explore other more methods to include more information (like 2nd/3rd vertex), all the LEP methods can be a good reference to start with
    • Worry about correlations between multiple methods when combining them
      • Suggest at least 3 subcategories (B0, Bs, Λb, only the neutral ones need to be tagged)
There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.